Save The Chandlers » Lynn Rival http://www.savethechandlers.com Your donation and support could help! Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:59:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 en hourly 1 Relief mixed with sadness as Paul Chandler told of death of father after pirate release http://www.savethechandlers.com/2010/11/18/relief-mixed-with-sadness-as-paul-chandler-told-of-death-of-father-after-pirate-release/ http://www.savethechandlers.com/2010/11/18/relief-mixed-with-sadness-as-paul-chandler-told-of-death-of-father-after-pirate-release/#comments Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:51:58 +0000 admin http://www.savethechandlers.com/?p=347 The release of Paul Chandler after more than a year in captivity at the hands of Somali pirates was mixed with sadness as he learnt of the death of his father for the first time.

During his time as a hostage Mr Chandler had repeatedly voiced fears for his father, Alfred, who reached the age of 99 in June but did not live to see his son released.

On an internet blog on which they charted their adventures travelling in their yacht the Lynn Rival, they described spending much of the time at Mr Chandler’s home which they described as a “lovely place to relax by the sea.”
In one of the last updates before their disappearance while sailing from the Seychelles to Tanzania, they posted a photograph of the sea view from Mr Chandler’s home labelled as “a reminder of Dartmouth”.

Another photograph shows the couple strolling along the seafront at Torcross with Mr Chandler senior, dressed in a coat and hat, resting contentedly on the sea wall, his walking stick loosely in one hand.

A caption read affectionately: “Torcross, after fish and chips with Pa.”

The former civil engineer, he continued to live independently following the death of his wife, despite suffering deafness.

But he passed away in late July, after a spell of ill health, only a few weeks after turning 99.

Although there was some contact between the Chandlers and their family through intermediaries, it was feared it could worsen their anxiety if they were told about the death.

Instead they were given the news shortly after their release on Sunday. In a statement they said they were coming to terms with their loss.

A video sent to relatives in Britain by the family during the summer as proof that they were still alive makes clear the level of Mr Chandler’s concern for his father while in captivity.

“They don’t care about our families whatsoever,” he is heard saying at one point.

“My father – I hope he is still alive I have no idea, he would have been 99 in June theses fellows don’t give a damn.
“They really don’t think we deserve to have a family.”

In a statement issued through the Foreign Office yesterday the couple said: “We have just learned that Paul’s father died in late July, and we obviously need to come to terms with that.
“We will return to the UK very soon.”

Relatives in Britain disclosed that one of the main hurdles they faced in their efforts to secure the Chandlers’ release was the refusal of some pirates to accept that they were not millionaires.

Ransom negotiations broke down several times during the Kent couple’s 388 ordeal because pirate leaders refused to believe that more money could not be raised.

“Throughout the protracted discussions…it has been a difficult task for the family to get across the message that these were two retired people on a sailing trip on a small private yacht,” the couple’s relatives said in a statement.
“[They are] not part of a major commercial enterprise involving tens of millions of pounds of assets.

“Thankfully, common sense finally prevailed and a solution was obtained for their release.”

Pirates who hijack large commercial ships can expect insurance companies swiftly to arrange negotiated payouts averaging £2 million.

But Mr and Mrs Chandler had ploughed their lifesavings into their 38ft yacht, Lynn Rival, and had even sold their house in Tunbridge Wells to fund their retirement on the ocean.

Original source of article
]]>
http://www.savethechandlers.com/2010/11/18/relief-mixed-with-sadness-as-paul-chandler-told-of-death-of-father-after-pirate-release/feed/ 0
Solution for the release of British sailing couple http://www.savethechandlers.com/2010/01/22/solution-for-the-release-of-british-sailing-couple/ http://www.savethechandlers.com/2010/01/22/solution-for-the-release-of-british-sailing-couple/#comments Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:11:27 +0000 admin http://www.savethechandlers.com/?p=183 Paul and Rachel Chandler, the British sailing couple taken hostage by Somali pirates in October, are approaching their 100th day in captivity.   Repeated efforts have proven unsuccessful in negotiating their release.

SaveTheChandlers.com was created in an attempt to raise both awareness and money to help gain the Chandlers freedom.  Via many emails from concerned citizens and heavy web traffic, it appears that more people are following as this tragic event unfolds.  However, Im sad to say that we have only raised a little over $100. If each viewer would have donated $10, I wouldn’t be writing this post right now!

We all have our opinions as to how to “handle” this situation.  Some believe that negotiations with pirates only encourages more kidnappings.  Others feel that we should give the money and help Paul and Rachel resume their peaceful lives.

Regardless of your personal and political beliefs around this matter, it appears we may be coming up against a deadline for action.   Considering the latest news obtained from telephone conversations with the Chandlers, the time to act is now!

Here are the facts:

Thanks to the valiant efforts of the Merchant Maritime Warfare Center (MMWC) and its chairman Nick Davis, they raised $100,000 which the pirates agreed would be enough to free them.

Unfortunately, the UK Government intervened and blocked the transaction so they could not make the exchange.

What I propose:

Since it appears that there IS money available and the only thing preventing their freedom is the UK Government, I propose a way in which the government does not have to be involved in the exchange!

The internet is a wonderful tool and should be used in this case as well!  By using a method of money transfer such as PayPal or even wire transfer to an account, we could effectively give the pirates the previously agreed upon sum of $100,000 US.    All they need to do is set up an account in their country and we can transfer the funds.

This can be performed in 2 stages so both parties will feel protected.  I suggest that we transfer $50,000 UPON Rachel Chadlers SAFE release and confirmed passage back to the UK.  When she is free, we will give them the money as a way of showing that we are willing to complete the exchange.  The pirates will still have Paul as collateral that we will perform our part.

After her exchange, the pirates should be able to see that we are willing to work with them and eager to exchange Paul for the remaining $50,000, also for his safe and confirmed release.

If you are someone who can represent the pirates, I suggest you contact me.

If you are a member of the MMWC and still have access to the funds, I suggest you contact me.

If you are a concerned citizen who wants to help (either through money or other support), I suggest you contact me!

Once again, my goal is not to challenge the pros and cons of hostage negotiations, its merely to see that Paul and Rachel have a chance to live out their natural lives!

]]>
http://www.savethechandlers.com/2010/01/22/solution-for-the-release-of-british-sailing-couple/feed/ 2
Somali pirates refuse to release British sailors for Christmas http://www.savethechandlers.com/2009/12/25/somali-pirates-refuse-to-release-british-sailors-for-christmas/ http://www.savethechandlers.com/2009/12/25/somali-pirates-refuse-to-release-british-sailors-for-christmas/#comments Fri, 25 Dec 2009 18:58:42 +0000 admin http://www.savethechandlers.com/?p=166 Its unfortunate and sad that Paul and Rachel Chandler will not be celebrating Christmas this year with their family.

Kidnapped on October 22, 2009 by Somali pirates, the two british sailors are still being held by their captors.

Unconfirmed reports state that Somali’s Radio Gaalkacyo said the couple faced daily threats from the pirates who hijacked their yacht.

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) said it was continuing to monitor the situation “closely”.  This comes after several failed attempts to seek the release of the Chandlers.

Paul and Rachel Chandler taken captive by Somali Pirates

Paul and Rachel Chandler held captive by Somali Pirates

Radio reports on Wednesday from the coastal town of Xarardheer, also known as Harardheer, said the hostages were facing difficult living conditions while in captivity.

The pirates have previously demanded $7 million in a phone call to the BBC, and said they would shoot Paul and Rachel if it were not paid.

Negotiations have enticed the pirates to accept a much lessor sum of $165,000, however the British government intervened and blocked the transaction.

The FCO has previously expressed sympathy for the victims’ families, but has continued to reiterate its position that it does not “make substantive concessions to hostage takers, including ransoms”.

Their family made another appeal for their release after seeing the footage of them surrounded by gunmen.

]]>
http://www.savethechandlers.com/2009/12/25/somali-pirates-refuse-to-release-british-sailors-for-christmas/feed/ 2
Hostages Paul and Rachel Chandler beg for Christmas release http://www.savethechandlers.com/2009/12/13/hostages-paul-and-rachel-chandler-beg-for-christmas-release/ http://www.savethechandlers.com/2009/12/13/hostages-paul-and-rachel-chandler-beg-for-christmas-release/#comments Sun, 13 Dec 2009 15:36:04 +0000 admin http://www.savethechandlers.com/?p=152 he British couple held by Somali pirates have pleaded with the government to get them “out by Christmas, by whatever means”.

In their first telephone call for five weeks, Paul and Rachel Chandler urged the authorities to talk to their captors to help free them.

The Chandlers, from Tunbridge Wells, Kent, were kidnapped while they sailed their yacht, Lynn Rival, near the Seychelles in late October.

Paul Chandler, 59, a retired quantity surveyor, who sounded calm, said: “I would like to say to the British government: get us out by Christmas, by whatever means.” But indicating his disillusion, he added: “We don’t think there’s much chance, seriously.”

The Sunday Times obtained the interview with Chandler and his 55-year-old wife through a local journalist, “Omar”, who travelled to the area where they are being held and allowed them to speak to this newspaper via his mobile phone.

There were unconfirmed reports last week that the couple were on the verge of being freed for a $100,000 (£61,500) ransom when the government blocked the deal. In response to that claim, Chandler said: “We have no knowledge of what is happening in Britain except that we have been told that the government has refused to become involved.

“As far as we are concerned it is not a straightforward piracy business, it is a plain criminal kidnapping and … should be approached with a rather different approach than the government uses.

“When you have a criminal gang carrying out a kidnapping, [the government] should not be averse to negotiating with that gang and following it up with whatever means. I don’t think the government should step back and say ‘this is nothing to do with us’.”

The pirates had demanded a ransom of $7m but, when handed the phone, the gang’s leader would only say: “We do not wish to put a figure on the couple’s head but what I would say is that we are open to negotiations.”

The Foreign Office refuses to negotiate with hostage takers. A spokesman said: “We call for the release of Paul and Rachel. Our efforts are ongoing to secure the safe release of the couple. We are in close touch with the family.”

The Ministry of Defence (MoD) yesterday admitted that Bob Ainsworth, the defence secretary, had authorised a Royal Marine unit that witnessed the kidnapping to intervene. But it said it was the ship’s commander who decided it was unsafe to attempt a rescue.

The RFA Wave Knight was within 50 yards of the pirates and had a marine unit and a Merlin helicopter aboard. But Sir Mark Stanhope, the first sea lord, claimed the ship did not have the expertise required for a hostage rescue.

An MoD spokesman defended the failure to intervene. “It was entirely proper for those responsible for carrying out the operation to make tactical level decisions,” he said.

“Those responsible for carrying out the operation had to balance capabilities and possible actions against the risk to life.”

Pirates usually keep the crews aboard after hijacking ships. But they abandoned the Chandlers’ yacht and took them to the mainland. They are now moving around, living in Land Cruisers which are changed regularly.

The gang appears desperate to ransom the couple because other groups, including hard-line Islamists, are threatening to attack them.

When the Chandlers complained to Omar about the lack of communication to the outside world, he gave them his radio. He also gave them his pen.

The couple are drinking plenty of water but not eating well as they are finding it difficult to consume the local dishes of meat, rice, pasta and a traditional Somali pancake known as anjeero.

Omar said that Paul Chandler seemed to have lost weight since the couple were last seen in a film broadcast on November 20. The video showed them looking thin and fatigued, pleading for the government to start negotiating with the gangs and saying they might otherwise be killed.

Somali pirates do not normally harm their hostages but this case appears to be more complicated. In commercial piracy, the gangs deal with insurance firms or shipping companies which would eventually pay a ransom.

However, the Chandlers, who are both retired, had sold their house in Britain to go sailing and have no money.

Article sourced from Timesonline
]]>
http://www.savethechandlers.com/2009/12/13/hostages-paul-and-rachel-chandler-beg-for-christmas-release/feed/ 0
Royal Marines could have rescued pirate hostages, but the order to attack never came http://www.savethechandlers.com/2009/11/29/royal-marines-could-have-rescued-pirate-hostages-but-the-order-to-attack-never-came/ http://www.savethechandlers.com/2009/11/29/royal-marines-could-have-rescued-pirate-hostages-but-the-order-to-attack-never-came/#comments Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:30:09 +0000 admin http://www.savethechandlers.com/?p=118 The disturbing truth behind the Royal Navy’s failure to prevent Somali pirates kidnapping a British couple from their yacht can be revealed today.

 An investigation by The Mail on Sunday demolishes accounts by the Ministry of Defence and the head of the Navy which suggest that a naval vessel at the scene had no rescue force available.

In fact, far from being a toothless bystander, the Royal Fleet Auxiliary ship Wave Knight was within seconds of unleashing a crack team of 20 lethally armed Royal Marines.

 

So close to freedom: The Chandlers are still in captivity. They have been filmed saying they were ‘unharmed’ but that their captors were losing patience

So close to freedom: The Chandlers are still in captivity. They have been filmed saying they were ‘unharmed’ but that their captors were losing patience

Wave Knight’s crew have been so angered by the official portrayal of events that one witness has given us a career-risking statement.

His evidence raises troubling questions about Government and military policy on piracy. And many people will want to know why an elite commando troop, mustered in black combat fatigues only yards from the kidnappers, was not permitted to put its air and seaborne assault training into action. 

The astonishing stand-off occurred on day six of the hostage crisis as the pirates attempted to transfer Paul Chandler, 59, and his wife, Rachel, 55, to their mother ship.

 

Witness: The military ship RFA Wave Knight which allegedly watched as the Chandlers were taken captive by Somalian pirates

Witness: The military ship RFA Wave Knight which allegedly watched as the Chandlers were taken captive by Somalian pirates

The Chandlers had been seized early on October 23 as they tried to sail their yacht, Lynn Rival, from the Seychelles across the Indian Ocean to Tanzania.

The couple no doubt believed their voyage was safe. In the past, Somali pirates have operated closer to their home ports some 1,000 miles north.

 But increasing anti-piracy patrols by Nato and other navies have pushed them south to seek new hunting grounds, and armed pirates aboard at least two fast motorised skiffs ambushed them only 150 miles into the trip. 

The Chandlers, from Tunbridge Wells, Kent, managed to send out a distress call but were quickly overpowered.

 

The Chandlers' yacht, lashed to the deck of the Wave Knight

The Chandlers' yacht, lashed to the deck of the Wave Knight

Realising it would take too long and be too risky to sail Lynn Rival back to northern Somalia, the kidnappers radioed for support from one of the country’s most notorious pirate ‘nests’ – Haradheere.

Within 72 hours, accomplices were sailing south in the 24,000-ton container vessel Kota Wajar, itself hijacked while en route from Shanghai to Kenya on October 15.

On October 26, the commander of Wave Knight, Captain Clarke, was briefed on the crisis. Intelligence sources had uncovered Kota Wajar’s role as mother ship to the kidnappers and she was being tracked.

As the closest Royal Navy ship available, Wave Knight was ordered to find her and slow her down by any means. A Wave class supply ship, she is mostly crewed by 75 civilians working under military discipline.

‘They had just trained for exactly this scenario’

However, crucially, Captain Clarke had on board the Marines, a Merlin helicopter and firepower in the form of 30mm and 50mm cannons. Around 25 Royal Navy sailors were also present.

The MoD’s first version of events avoided mentioning any chase, confrontation or rescue plan. This was all air-brushed out of the official picture – along with the Marines.

Indeed, the MoD at first acknowledged simply that an unnamed Royal Navy vessel had come across the Chandlers’ empty yacht. Only after the Daily Mail revealed that Wave Knight was almost alongside the Chandlers, her crew watching as the couple were hustled aboard the Kota Wajar, did the MoD change stance.

 

The yacht belonging to Paul and Rachel Chandler being unloaded at Portland Port in Dorset

The yacht belonging to Paul and Rachel Chandler being unloaded at Portland Port in Dorset

A second, carefully worded statement then claimed that ‘everything possible was done without further endangering the lives of Paul and Rachel Chandler’.

It added: ‘We do not comment on operational detail but RFA Wave Knight did very well under the circumstances.’

Days later, the head of the Navy, Admiral Sir Mark Stanhope, went further, insisting that Wave Knight’s ‘sailors with pistols couldn’t do the job of ensuring the safety of the Chandlers’.

And even last week he insisted that everything possible had been done to rescue the Chandlers.

In a speech at Chatham House, he said: ‘Wave Knight did exactly the right thing… Had there been an opportunity to intervene, while being sure of guaranteeing Paul and Rachel Chandlers’ safety, they would have done so.’

In fact, according to our source, these official explanations are travesties of the truth. His account states that Wave Knight left her British base at Bahrain around October 14 and headed south into the Gulf of Aden’s so-called ‘pirate alley’.

Her role included servicing and refuelling ships from Nato’s task force but she was also fully equipped for boarding operations.

As news of the Chandlers’ kidnap spread around the world, the crew kept in touch with developments via news websites. On October 26, Captain Clarke issued a loudspeaker announcement, or ‘information pipe’, explaining that they were heading south – away from traditional pirate waters. Although he didn’t mention the Lynn Rival by name, our source says it was obvious to the crew that a rescue attempt was ‘on the cards’.

The 31,500-ton Wave Knight sighted the Kota Wajar on the evening of October 28 and immediately tried to intimidate her by closing to less than 100 yards. At this point the Lynn Rival was not in sight so there were no hostages on board the pirate ship.

The supply ship was ‘closed up’ for action – meaning that all hatches, doors and gun emplacements were sealed with personnel out of sight. Lights were extinguished except for the powerful searchlights raking back and forth across the Kota Wajar’s hull.

At first the pirates appeared to be unconcerned. Their vessel was, in the source’s words, ‘lit up like a Christmas tree’ for the first 30 minutes.

But suddenly it, too, snapped out its lights and the two ships steamed alongside each other in darkness.

 

Kidnapped: Paul and Rachel Chandler were sailing around the world when their boat was hijacked by Somalian pirates

Kidnapped: Paul and Rachel Chandler were sailing around the world when their boat was hijacked by Somalian pirates

But Wave Knight’s tactics had no effect. Even warning bursts from one of her two bridge cannons, which fire 30mm shells with the power to penetrate the hull of a small air or sea craft, failed to alter the pirates’ course or speed.

The cannons have a range of about a mile and can fire up to 1,000 rounds a minute travelling at 600 yards per second. Undeterred, the pirates returned fire using small arms and the cat-and-mouse confrontation continued.

According to the source, it now became clear that the Marines were preparing for action. They had just completed two weeks of intensive training for precisely the scenario they faced – an air and seaborne assault on a pirate vessel.

‘In horror and disbelief, Wave Knight’s crew watched as a line was thrown from the Lynn Rival’

The Wave Knight and the Kota Wajar were still some distance from the Lynn Rival and Chandlers, so there was no danger of the hostages being caught in crossfire.

Like all the ship’s military personnel they had been on a state of permanent readiness, known as ‘Alert 60’, for two weeks. This required that they could muster within an hour.

Twice that night, between 10pm and 1am, they went a step further. On each occasion the codeword indicating imminent action – Quickdraw – was repeated over the ship’s intercom.

Each time the Marines gathered quickly on deck, their all-black fatigues, balaclavas, night-vision goggles and carbines a picture of professional menace.

Close by, Royal Navy aircrew sat at the controls of the Merlin awaiting their start-up order. 

 

This picture taken from the Wave Knight shows the Chandlers' yacht drifting - and HMS Cumberland, which arrived too late

This picture taken from the Wave Knight shows the Chandlers' yacht drifting - and HMS Cumberland, which arrived too late

The ship’s gun teams – who are also armed with general purpose machine guns firing 7.62mm rounds at up to 950 per minute with a range of 4,000 yards – stared out at target areas on the Kota Wajar.

But on each occasion the assault team – part of the Royal Marines Fleet Protection Group based at Faslane on the River Clyde – was stood down.

According to our source the pirates, still apparently believing that they were up against a mere supply ship, appeared almost contemptuous when they finally drew alongside the Chandlers’ yacht and hailed the kidnappers on board.

In horror and disbelief, Wave Knight’s crew watched as a line was thrown from the Lynn Rival. The yacht was then casually hauled in and moored alongside the Kota Wajar together with the pirate skiffs.

Throughout this 20-minute period, the Chandlers and their captors could be fleetingly glimpsed as shadows and silhouettes in the supply ship’s searchlight.

Although the Wave Knight remained darkened, it is inconceivable that the couple could have mistaken it for anything other than a naval vessel and perhaps dared to hope a rescue was imminent.

In the sweltering night, illuminated only by the stars and sweeps of the Wave Knight’s searchlights, the Chandlers could be seen climbing a ladder on the side of the Kota Wajar, with pirate guards above and below them.

 

 pic7

Then they disappeared into the ship’s hull. The Kota Wajar turned and steamed slowly north with its hostages.

It was, according to our source, a surreal moment. Having been feet away, poised for a dramatic rescue, some of the world’s most feared fighting troops were now being ordered to pack their kit and go to bed.

A pursuit of the Kota Wajar was, apparently, deemed pointless.

The source added: ‘The mood among the Marines was one of intense anger and frustration. These guys were right up for it – absolutely champing at the bit. It was precisely the situation they had trained for.

‘We had all watched them practising rapid-roping [descending at speed on ropes from a helicopter] and sea-borne assaults. They knew exactly what to do. They were poised there like a bunch of Ninjas and the adrenaline was pumping.

‘They couldn’t believe the orders to stand down. The anger was obvious. I heard one joke later that they had all the gear while Northwood [UK command HQ] had no idea. We had a chance to strike a real blow at the pirates and send a message that you don’t mess with the Royal Navy.

 

Ready for action: Royal Marines were poised to stage a dramatic rescue but were stood down

Ready for action: Royal Marines were poised to stage a dramatic rescue but were stood down

‘Judging by its actions, the Kota Wajar had no idea who we had on board. They thought we were just a supply ship. There was a great opportunity to take them by surprise.’

The source recalled seeing the silhouettes of the pirates and the Chandlers being taken off the yacht.

‘The Marines were saying, “Now’s the time. Surely it’s got to be now.” But the order never came.

‘The Kota Wajar just sailed off slowly as if to say, “You can’t touch us now. We’ve got the hostages.” They knew they’d won.’

The crew member added: ‘The Marines were more than capable of seizing the Kota Wajar way before she got near the Chandlers.

‘At that time there were no hostages on board. You can argue that the Chandlers would still have been at risk from the pirates on their yacht. But we would have been in a strong position, having taken the Kota Wajar.

‘If the pirates had killed the Chandlers they would have had nothing and would have been totally exposed. It’s more likely that they would have negotiated a hostage exchange for their mother-ship and crew.

‘No rescue was without risk. But the Marines were in a great position and were never allowed to exploit it.’

 

The crew member is unsure precisely what weapons the Marines were carrying. But the Fleet Protection Group’s standard issue includes SA80 assault rifles, SA80A2K carbines, MP5a3 9mm sub-machine guns and high-power 9mm Browning pistols.

It can also deploy specialist marksmen known as Maritime Sniper Teams, skilled at ‘slotting’ enemy forces from distance. It is unclear whether an MST was present.

‘A 20-strong SBS team arrived two hours late’

As dawn broke, the crew of the Wave Knight sighted their flagship, HMS Cumberland. The frigate had arrived some two hours after the Kota Wajar’s departure.

Between the two vessels the abandoned Lynn Rival drifted ghost-like on the breeze. She was eventually hauled on to Wave Knight.

According to our source, the Navy’s refusal to attempt a rescue of the Chandlers appears to have been at least partly influenced by plans for a covert operation involving HMS Cumberland and a Special Boat Service troop.

He says the idea was to parachute 20 SBS men from a military transport plane into the sea off the Somali coast. They were to be picked up by Cumberland – whose movements throughout have never been revealed – to lead a rescue attempt.

 

Sailing enthusiasts: The Chandlers are believed to have been captured by Somali pirates while sailing between the Seychelles and Tanzania

Sailing enthusiasts: The Chandlers are believed to have been captured by Somali pirates while sailing between the Seychelles and Tanzania

However, the source claims the plan went disastrously wrong from the off. He says the SBS team, assembled at RAF Brize Norton, was delayed for around six hours due to ‘unforeseen events’. By the time Cumberland picked them up from the drop zone they were at least two hours behind the action.

Wave Knight ferried the SBS team – complete with parachutes, arms and equipment – 1,000 miles north to the Omani port of Salalah. It was during this trip, says the source, that nuggets of information emerged from the SBS men in Wave Knight’s mess rooms.

They were, he says, appalled at the lack of flexibility among senior commanders to adapt the rescue plan and send in the Marines.

Within hours this sense of frustration was heightened further. The source says that en route to Oman, the supply ship came across another pirate vessel – little more than the size of a tug – which opened fire on them.

‘It makes you wonder, what is the Royal Navy for?’

By now Wave Knight had 20 Marines and 20 SBS soldiers on board – arguably the most lethal assault force of any Nato vessel in the anti-piracy operation. The pirates had no known hostages aboard.

An assault party was placed on ‘Quickdraw’ alert and expectation rose among the crew that at last action was imminent.

Our source said: ‘We thought it was inevitable. Pirates had fired first at a Royal Navy ship. If this doesn’t satisfy the Rules of Engagement, then what does?

The pirates wouldn’t have done that to an American ship because the Americans shoot back – with interest.

We had all the firepower and expertise we needed several times over. Yet again the order came to stand down. It makes you wonder, what is the Royal Navy for?’

 

Deserted: The Chandlers' 38ft yacht Lynn Rival, pictured here being fixed before their ill-fated trip, was found abandoned by Royal Navy forces patrolling the pirate-infested waters off Somalia

Deserted: The Chandlers' 38ft yacht Lynn Rival, pictured here being fixed before their ill-fated trip, was found abandoned by Royal Navy forces patrolling the pirate-infested waters off Somalia

The SBS force was flown off Wave Knight by helicopter on November 1, landing in Salalah. A military transport plane immediately returned them to the UK.

Frustration among Wave Knight’s crew was not lost on senior commanders and early that morning Captain Clarke included a long, personal communique to the entire company in his Daily Orders.

The document confirms the presence of Royal Marines but refers to the SBS only as ‘embarked forces’. It is headed: ‘Command Aim TLC [Tender Loving Care] for embarked forces and make preparations for the safe and timely disembarkation of RM [Royal Marine] passengers and 814 Sqn Det [Merlin helicopter crew].’

The captain passed on congratulations from commanders at Northwood, near London, the Navy’s operational HQ and home of the Armed Forces Permanent Joint Headquarters, which controls all UK overseas operations.

They emphasised that the ship’s conduct was a ‘success story’, despite Northwood’s refusal to sanction a Marine rescue attempt.

After disembarking the SBS, Wave Knight headed back to the UK Maritime Component Command base in Bahrain, where 25 Royal Navy crew were landed.

The ship went on to Cyprus, where most of the Marines were dropped off for a week’s leave before being re-deployed or returning to their families.

She then returned to the UK, docking last Thursday in Portland, Dorset, with only her 75 civilian crew aboard.

 

Adventurers: Rachel and Paul had embarked on numerous trips aboard their yacht, Lynn Rival

Adventurers: Rachel and Paul had embarked on numerous trips aboard their yacht, Lynn Rival

The Lynn Rival, which had been stashed on Wave Knight’s deck as our exclusive picture shows, was craned into the sea, then lifted on to a lorry and transported under cover to an unknown destination.

The Mail on Sunday’s revelations are certain to increase pressure on Admiral Stanhope to explain why he made an apparently misleading statement to The Times – an interview reprinted by other newspapers – on November 18.

His quote reads: ‘Two dead Chandlers would not have been good, and we wouldn’t have wanted to be part of that… It’s a huge piece of water and the fact that Wave Knight found the yacht was impressive, but we were not in a position to engage [the pirates]. We were too late for that.

‘You need special expertise to deal with hostage rescue, and we didn’t have that expertise [on board].

‘Sailors with pistols couldn’t do the job of ensuring the safety of the Chandlers. It was highly frustrating. There were broad rules of engagement that had to be followed, and it was a fairly easy decision to make because the security of the Chandlers was the most important thing.’

He added: ‘What could it [Wave Knight] do under the circumstances? Wave Knight is not a warship. There was only a flight [helicopter crew and engineers] on board, and as soon as they got close, the pirates threatened the hostages. They did the best they could, but the security of the Chandlers was the overriding factor.’

Last Friday he repeated his view in a speech at Chatham House, London, saying: ‘The sailors did a tremendous job in finding the Chandlers’ yacht in the first place. But once you have a hostage situation your military options, as most people would understand, are inevitably limited.

‘Had there been an opportunity to intervene, while being sure of guaranteeing the Chandlers’ safety, they would have done so. The decision not to was undoubtedly the right one.’

A senior Royal Navy source insisted last night that there were ten Marines on board Wave Knight, not 20.

An MoD spokesman said: ‘The First Sea Lord has always been clear that Wave Knight and those in command of this mission did exactly the right things.

‘As in all situations of this sort they had to balance capabilities and possible actions against the risk to life.

‘They did everything that they could in that operation and, could action have been taken, with a guarantee on the safety of the Chandlers, they would have done so.

‘Previous statements have only concerned detail that is already in the public domain, or would not be of use to the pirates we are trying to counter. We will not comment further on this detail. Discussing our capabilities in this way could reveal valuable information.’

For the Royal Marines and crew of the Wave Knight, those words surely carry a hollow ring.

As for the Chandlers, whose lives are being ransomed in Somalia for £4million, the agonising memory of October 28 is unlikely to fade soon.

They saw the Navy come to their rescue and then sink their hopes.

 

This article was sourced from www.dailymail.co.uk
]]>
http://www.savethechandlers.com/2009/11/29/royal-marines-could-have-rescued-pirate-hostages-but-the-order-to-attack-never-came/feed/ 2
Pirate kidnapped yacht arrives in UK http://www.savethechandlers.com/2009/11/27/pirate-kidnapped-yacht-arrives-in-uk/ http://www.savethechandlers.com/2009/11/27/pirate-kidnapped-yacht-arrives-in-uk/#comments Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:45:15 +0000 admin http://www.savethechandlers.com/?p=101 The Chandlers yacht returns to UK

The Chandlers yacht returns to UK

The yacht which British couple Paul and Rachel Chandler were on when they were abducted by Somali pirates has been returned to Portland Harbor, in Dorset UK.

The Chandlers are still being held for ransom for a reported $7 million, however news posts have mentioned that the pirates may be willing to negotiate for a lesser amount.

The yacht, Lynn Rival was picked up by the Royal Fleet Auxiliary ship Wave Knight. The Wave Knight returned to British waters yesterday to unload the yacht.

According to members on the military vessel, the crew had been ‘forced’ to watch as the couple were kidnapped by pirates. Military officials insisted the crew members could not have acted without endangering the Chandlers lives.

There were 75 merchant seamen and 25 sailors aboard the Wave Knight at the time of the abduction.

The couple were forced to change course to Somalia before being put on a container ship, the Kota Wajar, which had also been taken by the pirates. Based on videos released last week, they now appear to be ashore.

Mr Chandler, a quantity surveyor, and his economist wife have spent several six-month spells at sea.

It later emerged the Wave Knight, carrying a helicopter, was near to the drama.

A Ministry of Defence spokesman said: “Every effort was made by the Royal Navy and the international maritime fleet to locate the Lynn Rival.

“We did everything we could possibly do without further endangering the lives of Paul and Rachel Chandler.”

 

Portions of this article were sourced from www.dorsetecho.co.uk
]]>
http://www.savethechandlers.com/2009/11/27/pirate-kidnapped-yacht-arrives-in-uk/feed/ 0
The pirates MAY negotiate a much lower ransom! http://www.savethechandlers.com/2009/11/26/the-pirates-may-negotiate-a-much-lower-ransom/ http://www.savethechandlers.com/2009/11/26/the-pirates-may-negotiate-a-much-lower-ransom/#comments Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:19:59 +0000 admin http://www.savethechandlers.com/?p=72 Paul Chandler on the Lynn Rival

Paul Chandler on the Lynn Rival

An article was found on Fox News, posted November 1, 2009, that gives some hope that it may be easier to get Paul and Rachel home quicker and for less money!

According to the news post, Andrew Mwangura, coordinator of the East African Seafarers’ Assistance Program announced he has been working with Somali elders to help free the couple.

 

“The (Somali) pirates realize now that the Chandlers are not rich people.  They will be persuaded to lower their demand, maybe to $165,000″- as quoted by Mwangura

While it appears the pirates are willing to negotiate, the fact still stands that they are still being held with the impending threat of being killed if their demands are not met.   Some of you may not agree with giving into the pirates demands, however, if we can help these people escape from the region it will clear the way for the US, British and other governments to ‘get involved’ to put a permanent end to this problem!


]]>
http://www.savethechandlers.com/2009/11/26/the-pirates-may-negotiate-a-much-lower-ransom/feed/ 2
Article about Paul and Rachel Chandlers kidnapping http://www.savethechandlers.com/2009/11/21/article-about-paul-and-rachel-chandlers-kidnapping/ http://www.savethechandlers.com/2009/11/21/article-about-paul-and-rachel-chandlers-kidnapping/#comments Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:13:53 +0000 admin http://www.savethechandlers.com/?p=39 The

The Chandlers boat found abandoned

I just found another article about the kidnapping of Paul and Rachel Chandler.  Please keep spreading the word and consider GETTING INVOLVED!  I have created this site for the sole purpose of give an electronic means of creating awareness and support.  If you want to help post articles and spread the word, please contact me either through Facebook or at [email protected]

]]>
http://www.savethechandlers.com/2009/11/21/article-about-paul-and-rachel-chandlers-kidnapping/feed/ 1
Just found the Chandlers website… http://www.savethechandlers.com/2009/11/21/just-found-the-chandlers-website/ http://www.savethechandlers.com/2009/11/21/just-found-the-chandlers-website/#comments Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:14:46 +0000 admin http://www.savethechandlers.com/?p=22 Paul and Rachel Chandlers Website outlining the voyage on their boat "Lynn Rival"

Paul and Rachel Chandlers Website outlining the voyage on their boat "Lynn Rival"

I just found the Chandlers website that is/was documenting their journey.   Their last entry was “PLEASE RING SARAH” posted on Friday October 23, 2009.   According to reports, this would have been 1 day after the capture.

I haven’t read through the whole site yet, however it appears that all was well until the last post.
With the last message in all CAPs making reference to “Sarah”, I would assume that the Chandlers may have access to a satellite phone and were reaching out for help.

Sarah, if there is anything I, or this site, can do right now, please contact me at [email protected] As I’ve been mentioning, my goal is to help people like the Chandlers in coming to a resolution of this matter through the power of the internet.

]]>
http://www.savethechandlers.com/2009/11/21/just-found-the-chandlers-website/feed/ 0